Fact-checked by the CapitalLendingNews editorial team

Single-parent households carry a disproportionate share of high-APR debt. According to Federal Reserve consumer credit data, the average American household carries over $6,000 in revolving credit card debt. Single-parent households frequently carry two to three times that figure, with fewer income streams to absorb it.

Prolonged periods of elevated interest rates have made high-APR balances more destructive than they were a decade ago. Eliminating them in mathematically optimal order is no longer a preference. It is a financial necessity.

What Exactly Is the Debt Avalanche Strategy?

Structured around a single core rule, the debt avalanche strategy works like this: pay minimums on all debts, then direct every extra dollar toward the balance carrying the highest annual percentage rate. Once that balance reaches zero, the freed-up payment rolls entirely into the next-highest-rate debt.

The method is mathematically superior to the debt snowball strategy, which targets smallest balances first. Research published by the Harvard Business Review confirms that avalanche users pay less total interest over a repayment period, often by thousands of dollars on balances above $20,000.

For a deeper comparison of both methods side by side, see our breakdown of Debt Avalanche vs Debt Snowball, including which approach works better depending on your psychological profile and income stability.

Why the Math Favors Avalanche Over Snowball

Interest compounds daily on most credit cards. Every day a high-APR balance sits unpaid, it accrues more interest than a low-APR balance of identical size. Targeting the highest rate first interrupts that compounding cycle at its most damaging point.

To understand exactly how that compounding works against you over time, read our explainer on how interest rate compounding costs more than you expect.

What Did the $40,000 Debt Portfolio Actually Look Like?

The debt portfolio in this scenario consisted of four distinct balances, a realistic mix that reflects what many single parents carry after a divorce, job transition, or medical expense.

Total minimum payments came to $885 per month. The single parent in this case, a 34-year-old registered nurse working in a mid-sized city, allocated an additional $415 per month toward debt, bringing total monthly repayment to $1,300. That extra $415 was directed exclusively at Credit Card A first, given its 26.99% APR.

Credit Card A was eliminated in month 14. The full $663 previously going to Card A (minimum plus extra) then cascaded onto Credit Card B. This avalanche roll is what accelerates payoff speed dramatically in years two and three.

One common mistake at this stage is redirecting freed-up payments toward spending rather than the next debt. Our guide to 5 mistakes people make when paying off credit card debt covers this and other critical pitfalls in detail.

How the Payoff Timeline Unfolded Month by Month

Understanding the avalanche in theory is one thing. Seeing how the timeline actually compresses across three years makes the case more concretely.

In months one through fourteen, the nurse paid minimums on Credit Card B, the personal loan, and the auto loan, while putting $663 per month ($248 minimum plus $415 extra) against Credit Card A. At a 26.99% APR on a $12,400 balance, roughly $279 of that first payment went to interest alone. That ratio improved every single month as the principal fell.

The Acceleration Effect After Month 14

Once Credit Card A reached zero, the full $663 rolled onto Credit Card B. Combined with its existing $174 minimum, that meant $837 per month was now attacking an $8,700 balance at 22.49% APR. Credit Card B was eliminated in approximately month 24.

At that point, $1,011 per month shifted to the personal loan. The personal loan’s 14.75% fixed rate and declining balance meant it fell quickly under that level of payment pressure, clearing around month 31. The final five months concentrated entirely on the auto loan at 7.99%, which fell ahead of schedule.

The critical insight here is compounding acceleration. The nurse’s total monthly outflow never changed from $1,300. What changed was how much of it was eating principal versus interest, and how many accounts that principal power was concentrated against. Spreading extra payments across all four balances simultaneously would have extended the payoff timeline by an estimated 14 to 18 months and added several thousand dollars in total interest.

What Happens If You Skip the Roll-Over

Skipping the roll-over, even once, breaks the engine. If the nurse had absorbed the $663 freed from Card A back into monthly spending rather than redirecting it, the remaining three debts would have continued on their minimum-payment schedules. At minimums only, the personal loan and auto loan combined would have taken another four to five years to clear. The avalanche strategy only works when freed cash flows forward automatically, not selectively.

How Did a Single Parent Find Extra Money to Accelerate Payoff?

Finding surplus income as a single parent requires auditing spending with more precision than a dual-income household typically applies. The nurse identified $415 in monthly surplus through three specific changes, not through a dramatic lifestyle overhaul.

• Cancelled two streaming subscriptions and a gym membership: $87/month
• Meal-prepped five dinners per week, reducing food delivery costs: $160/month
• Negotiated a lower rate on renters insurance through Progressive: $34/month
• Picked up two additional nursing shifts per month: $134/month after taxes

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s budgeting tools recommend identifying fixed, variable, and discretionary expenses separately before committing to a repayment plan. That step came before month one.

Building a Minimal Emergency Fund First

Before accelerating debt payments, the nurse held back $1,200, roughly one month of essential expenses, in a high-yield savings account. This step is not optional. Without a buffer, a single unexpected car repair or medical copay can derail the entire plan and force new credit card use, effectively resetting months of progress. For guidance on building that cushion on a tight income, see our article on how to build an emergency fund when you live paycheck to paycheck.

Research consistently shows that people who begin aggressive debt repayment without a starter emergency fund are far more likely to abandon the plan within six months. A buffer of even $1,000 to $1,500 dramatically improves completion rates by removing the need to reach for credit when an unexpected expense hits, per CFPB budgeting guidance.

Why Automation Is Not Optional

Every element of this plan that depended on a manual decision introduced failure risk. The nurse automated three things from the first month: all minimum payments, the extra $415 transfer to the avalanche target account, and the roll-over payment the moment a balance cleared.

Automation matters for a reason that goes beyond convenience. Behavioral finance research has repeatedly documented that people deplete accessible cash when given the opportunity, even when they intend not to. By treating the $415 surplus as already spent, committed to the debt account on payday, it was never available for discretionary use.

Setting Up the Cascade in Advance

Most banks and credit unions allow scheduled recurring payments to be set at amounts above the minimum. Before month one began, the nurse set Credit Card A’s scheduled payment to $663 and left the other three accounts at their minimum autopay amounts. When Card A was paid off in month 14, the only required action was updating two autopay amounts: set Card A to $0 and set Card B to $837. That two-minute task is the entire mechanical demand of maintaining an avalanche roll-over.

Not automating minimum payments carries a specific and severe consequence: a missed payment can trigger a penalty APR as high as 29.99% on the affected account, reordering the avalanche priority at the worst possible moment.

How Did the Debt Avalanche Strategy Affect Credit Score?

Credit scores improved steadily throughout the 36-month payoff period, but not immediately. In the first four months, the score held flat because balances were still high and no accounts had been closed.

By month 15, when Credit Card A was paid in full, the borrower’s credit utilization ratio dropped from 68% to 41%. According to FICO’s credit education guidelines, utilization above 30% suppresses scores significantly, so this single reduction produced a 47-point score increase in the following billing cycle.

The credit bureaus, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, all reflect utilization changes within one to two billing cycles of updated balance reporting. The borrower did not close the paid-off card accounts, preserving the available credit limit and keeping utilization lower during payoff of the remaining balances.

Final Credit Score Outcome

By month 36, with all four debts eliminated, the nurse’s FICO Score 8 had risen from 591 to 724, moving from the “fair” tier to the “good” tier. This opened access to refinancing options and lower insurance premiums that partially offset the discipline required during repayment.

The Utilization Mechanics Worth Understanding

FICO calculates utilization both per-card and across all revolving accounts in aggregate. Paying off Credit Card A eliminated a $12,400 balance on an account that likely had a credit limit somewhere around $13,000, based on the near-maxed utilization at the start of the plan. Removing that balance reduced both the per-card utilization (from near 95% to 0%) and the aggregate revolving utilization simultaneously. Both figures factor into the score independently, which explains why the point gain was disproportionately large relative to the dollar reduction.

Keeping Card A open after payoff preserved its credit limit in the utilization denominator. Closing it would have shrunk available credit and pushed aggregate utilization upward on the remaining balances, producing a score drop at exactly the wrong moment in the plan.

Should You Pause Retirement Contributions During Debt Payoff?

This is the question most single parents get wrong, and the math is more straightforward than it appears.

If your employer offers a retirement match, contribute enough to capture it in full before directing any extra money to debt. A 100% match on 3% of salary is a 100% guaranteed return on that contribution. No debt, including a 26.99% APR credit card, produces a guaranteed 100% return on the money used to pay it down. The match threshold is the line.

Beyond the match, the calculus reverses. A credit card charging 26.99% is costing you more on a guaranteed basis than most investment accounts will return in any given year. Redirecting retirement contributions above the match threshold toward high-APR debt is the correct mathematical move until those balances are cleared.

The nurse in this case contributed exactly enough to her employer’s 403(b) plan to capture the full match, 3% of salary, throughout all 36 months. Everything above that went to debt. This approach preserved the guaranteed match return without sacrificing the avalanche momentum.

Who the Debt Avalanche Strategy Does Not Work Well For

Honest advice requires naming the cases where this approach struggles. The avalanche is not the right fit for everyone.

If your highest-APR balance is also your largest balance, you may go 12 to 18 months without seeing a single account reach zero. For people whose motivation depends on visible wins, that wait is genuinely difficult, and the research on behavioral follow-through supports that concern. The debt snowball’s psychological advantage is real, not just anecdotal. A plan you abandon at month eight saves less money than an imperfect plan you complete.

Single parents with genuinely unstable income, irregular freelance work, seasonal employment, or frequent gaps, also face a structural problem. The avalanche requires consistent surplus payments month after month. An income disruption that forces you to pull from a thin emergency fund and pause the extra payment doesn’t invalidate the strategy, but it does mean the 36-month projection stretches considerably. If income is erratic enough that a three-year commitment feels unrealistic, a hybrid approach or a shorter-horizon snowball on the two or three highest-rate cards only may be more practical.

The strategy also does nothing to address the source of the debt. A household that carries $40,000 in credit card balances due to a structural spending gap, where expenses routinely exceed income, needs that gap closed first. Running an avalanche plan while continuing to add new balances each month is counterproductive regardless of how disciplined the payoff sequence is.

What Mistakes Do Single Parents Make With the Debt Avalanche Strategy?

Most avalanche plans fail due to a predictable set of behavioral errors, not mathematical ones. Understanding these in advance significantly improves completion rates.

• Skipping the emergency fund: Starting without a buffer leads to new debt accumulation when an unexpected expense hits, which erases months of avalanche progress.
• Not automating minimum payments: A missed minimum payment triggers penalty APRs, often jumping to 29.99% or higher, and reorders the avalanche priority.
• Lifestyle creep after a payoff milestone: When Credit Card A is eliminated, the temptation to reward the effort with spending can absorb the freed payment before it rolls forward.
• Ignoring tax-advantaged accounts entirely: If an employer offers a 401(k) match, foregoing it to accelerate debt is almost always a mathematical error. A 100% match equals a 100% guaranteed return, which outpaces even a 26.99% APR on net basis.

For additional errors that derail repayment plans, our guide to common credit card debt payoff mistakes covers the behavioral and logistical traps in detail. If rising interest rates have been affecting your card balances, see our analysis on how rising interest rates affect your credit card balance.

The Psychological Demands of a 36-Month Plan

Three years is a long time to maintain financial discipline, particularly as a single parent managing childcare, unpredictable expenses, and the absence of a second income as a fallback. This aspect of the avalanche rarely gets addressed honestly.

The debt snowball method’s primary advantage is motivational: clearing small balances quickly produces visible wins. Avalanche front-loads its hardest work. The largest, highest-rate balance is the first target, and it takes the longest to clear. Fourteen months passed before the nurse saw a single account reach zero.

Strategies That Helped Sustain the Plan

Several practices helped maintain momentum across three years. Tracking net worth monthly rather than just debt balances reframed the effort: even in months where the debt number barely moved, watching overall net worth trend upward provided measurable evidence of progress. Using a simple spreadsheet with a projected payoff date updated monthly also helped, because seeing that date move closer, even by a few days, reinforced the value of staying consistent.

The nurse also set a specific non-financial reward at the 18-month mark, a weekend trip with her child budgeted in advance and paid in cash. Having a defined, planned reward at a midpoint reduced the urge to splurge when individual payoff milestones hit.

None of this required a personality transformation. It required a system. The avalanche works best when the behavioral variables are handled through structure rather than willpower.

Related reading: nurse used $15,000 personal loan.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does it take a single parent to pay off $40,000 using the debt avalanche method?

With consistent minimum payments plus an extra $400–$500 per month directed at the highest-APR balance, a $40,000 mixed-debt portfolio can be eliminated in approximately 34–40 months. The exact timeline depends on the interest rates involved and whether freed payments are rolled forward immediately.

Is the debt avalanche strategy better than the debt snowball for a single parent?

Mathematically, yes. The debt avalanche strategy saves more money in total interest, which matters more on a constrained single income. However, if motivation is the primary obstacle, the debt snowball’s early wins may produce better real-world results. Most financial planners recommend avalanche for those with high-APR credit card debt above 20%.

What credit score improvement can I expect while using the debt avalanche method?

Eliminating high-balance, high-utilization accounts typically produces a 30–60 point FICO score increase per payoff milestone, assuming no new debt is added. The biggest gains come from reducing revolving credit utilization below 30%, which FICO weights heavily in its scoring algorithm.

Should I stop contributing to retirement savings to accelerate the debt avalanche?

Only contribute enough to capture any employer match, then stop additional contributions until high-APR debt is cleared. A 3–6% employer match is effectively a 100% guaranteed return, which exceeds the cost of even high-APR debt on a net basis. Beyond the match threshold, redirecting contributions to debt payoff is mathematically sound.

Can I use the debt avalanche strategy on student loans?

Yes, student loans can be included in the avalanche stack. Federal student loans typically carry lower fixed rates than credit cards, so they usually fall near the bottom of the priority list. However, income-driven repayment options through the U.S. Department of Education may offer a better alternative if cash flow is severely constrained.

What happens if I miss a payment during the avalanche plan?

A single missed payment can trigger a penalty APR as high as 29.99% on the affected account and may damage your credit score by 60–110 points depending on your starting score. Automating all minimum payments before the plan begins eliminates this risk entirely.

How do I find extra money to put toward the avalanche if my budget is already stretched?

Start with a line-by-line audit of discretionary and variable spending before assuming there is no surplus. Common sources of freed cash include subscription services, food delivery, and insurance premiums that can be renegotiated. Even $200–$300 per month above minimums meaningfully compresses the payoff timeline compared to minimums alone. A modest income increase, a single additional shift or a small freelance project, can close the gap faster than cuts alone.

Should I close credit card accounts after paying them off during the avalanche?

No. Closing a paid-off account reduces your total available credit and raises your aggregate utilization ratio, which can lower your FICO score. Keep paid-off cards open with a zero balance. The available credit limit stays in the utilization denominator, which helps your score while you continue paying down the remaining balances.

Does the debt avalanche work if one of my debts has a variable interest rate?

It still works, but the priority order may shift over time. A variable-rate account that rises above a previously higher fixed rate should move up in the avalanche sequence. Review the rate order every three to six months if any of your balances carry variable APRs, and adjust the extra-payment target accordingly. The underlying principle, highest rate gets the extra payment, does not change.

What if I receive a windfall, like a tax refund or bonus, during the payoff period?

Apply it directly to the current avalanche target. A lump-sum payment against the highest-rate balance reduces the principal immediately, which lowers the daily interest accrual from that point forward and can shorten the payoff timeline by several months. Resist splitting a windfall across multiple accounts; concentrated application is more effective than spreading it.

The post How a Single Parent Used a Debt Avalanche Strategy to Pay Off $40,000 in Three Years appeared first on Capital Lending News.

Fact-checked by the CapitalLendingNews editorial team

The question of whether to pay off debt or invest pits your financial priorities against each other, and the answer shifts measurably when the Federal Reserve cuts rates. According to Federal Reserve H.15 data, average credit card interest rates remain near 21% even as benchmark rates decline, making the math unambiguous for high-interest borrowers.

Rate-cutting cycles change the calculus for moderate and low-interest debt holders. Understanding exactly where the threshold lies, and when to split your dollars between both goals, can save or earn you tens of thousands over a decade.

How Does the Rate Environment Change the Math?

Falling rates reduce the cost of new debt but rarely lower existing variable-rate balances fast enough to justify delaying payoff. When the Fed cuts the federal funds rate, credit card APRs do adjust, but with a lag, and only partially. Meanwhile, investment returns in equities can accelerate as cheaper capital fuels corporate earnings.

The core comparison is simple: if your debt’s interest rate exceeds your expected after-tax investment return, paying off debt wins. The S&P 500 has delivered an average annual return of roughly 10% over the long run, according to S&P Global’s index data. That benchmark matters because it sets the upper limit of what most passive investors can realistically expect.

For debts above that 10% threshold, credit cards, payday loans, or high-rate personal loans, repayment delivers a guaranteed equivalent return that no investment can match risk-free. The spread between your debt rate and your expected investment return is the single most important input in this decision.

The Role of Tax Advantages

Tax-advantaged accounts complicate the comparison. Contributing to a 401(k) with an employer match is effectively a 50–100% instant return on dollars invested, which almost always beats debt repayment. The IRS sets the 2025 401(k) contribution limit at $23,500, and capturing the full employer match should come before any additional debt payoff beyond minimums.

One honest caveat here: tax advantages do not eliminate investment risk. A 401(k) match is an instant guaranteed return, but funds invested beyond that match are still subject to market volatility. For someone within a few years of needing that money, or carrying debt above 10%, the guaranteed savings from payoff can be more valuable than additional market exposure, even inside a tax-advantaged wrapper.

What Interest Rate Threshold Determines the Right Choice?

The break-even point sits between 6% and 7% for most borrowers. Below that range, long-term investing in a diversified portfolio typically outperforms accelerated debt repayment. Above it, debt elimination becomes the mathematically superior move, and the psychological benefit of being debt-free adds additional real value.

This threshold shifts based on your tax bracket, investment time horizon, and risk tolerance. A 30-year-old investor with a 20-plus-year runway tolerates more volatility, pushing the threshold closer to 8%. A retiree or near-retiree with a shorter horizon should lower it to around 5%, since investment returns become less predictable over shorter periods.

For context on how compounding works against borrowers, our explainer on how interest rate compounding works and why it costs more than you expect shows exactly how quickly high-rate balances grow when left unpaid.

Which Debts Should You Target First in a Falling-Rate Cycle?

Target variable-rate, high-APR balances first, credit cards, personal loans, and certain HELOCs, because their rates do not fall quickly enough to wait. Fixed-rate debts like federal student loans or a 30-year mortgage are less urgent, especially when their rates sit below 6%.

NerdWallet’s 2025 credit card data shows the average variable APR remains near 20.78%, a rate that has barely budged despite multiple Fed cuts. Carrying even a $5,000 balance at that rate costs over $1,000 per year in interest alone. Those numbers make the debt-or-invest question straightforward for most cardholders: pay the card off first.

Borrowers managing multiple debts should review proven sequencing strategies. The debt avalanche vs. debt snowball comparison details how targeting highest-rate balances first minimizes total interest, the mathematically optimal path in a falling-rate environment.

Existing high-rate balances do not reprice overnight when the Fed cuts. Cardholders are still paying 20-plus percent while assuming they are operating in a low-rate world. A 0.25% Fed cut reduces borrowing costs by roughly $12.50 per year on a $5,000 balance, meaningful for new debt, but nearly irrelevant for balances you already carry. That gap is exactly why rate cuts rarely change the calculus for current high-interest borrowers. Per Bankrate’s current rate tracking, the transmission from policy rate to consumer APR remains slow and partial.

Should You Build an Emergency Fund Before Doing Either?

Yes, a 3-to-6 month emergency fund should precede aggressive debt payoff or heavy investing. Without liquid savings, unexpected expenses force you back onto high-interest credit, erasing any financial progress. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau recommends this buffer as the foundation of any debt-reduction plan.

Many borrowers skip this step because they want to eliminate interest costs immediately. That logic backfires. If your car needs a $1,500 repair and you have no savings, you add $1,500 back to the credit card you just paid down, plus interest from day one.

Our guide on how to build an emergency fund when you live paycheck to paycheck covers practical steps for establishing this baseline even on a tight budget. Once that cushion exists, the full debt-or-invest decision becomes far less risky to optimize.

How Should You Split Your Dollars When Both Options Make Sense?

When your debt rate falls in the 6%–9% grey zone, a split allocation strategy is often optimal. A common framework is the 50/50 rule: after minimum payments and emergency fund contributions, divide extra cash equally between debt payoff and investing. This hedges against both interest cost and opportunity cost at once.

A more structured approach prioritizes tax-advantaged investing first. Capturing any employer 401(k) match, then maxing a Roth IRA (2025 limit: $7,000), then directing remaining funds to debt above 7% is a sequencing approach endorsed by many certified financial planners. For more on the Roth vs. Traditional IRA decision, see our breakdown of which IRA actually saves you more money.

The split approach is not perfect for everyone. Borrowers who struggle with consistency, or who find the weight of outstanding debt genuinely stressful, often do better going all-in on payoff first, then pivoting to investing. The mathematically optimal plan only works if you stick to it. A slightly less efficient plan that you actually follow beats a theoretically superior one that you abandon after two months.

One common mistake is abandoning the split when markets drop or rates fluctuate. This decision should be reviewed annually, not adjusted reactively to headlines. Avoiding reactive decisions is one of the top mistakes people make when paying off credit card debt.

Related reading: Should You Use a Digital Loan to Pay Off Student Debt or a Refinancing Platform?.

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I pay off credit card debt before investing in my 401(k)?

Contribute enough to your 401(k) to capture the full employer match first, that is a guaranteed 50–100% return that no payoff strategy can beat. Beyond that match, credit card debt above 15% APR should take priority over additional 401(k) contributions, since the guaranteed interest savings exceed expected investment returns after fees.

What is the break-even interest rate for paying off debt vs. investing?

For most borrowers, the break-even falls between 6% and 7%. Debt above that rate typically warrants payoff priority over investing, since the guaranteed savings exceed the expected after-tax return from a diversified portfolio. Your specific tax bracket and investment time horizon shift this figure slightly.

Does paying off debt count as an investment?

Yes, eliminating debt at 20% APR is mathematically equivalent to earning a 20% guaranteed, risk-free return. No conventional investment reliably delivers that rate without significant risk, which is why financial planners treat debt elimination as a form of investing in both falling-rate and rising-rate environments.

Should I pay off student loans or invest when interest rates fall?

Federal student loan rates are fixed and typically range from 5% to 8% for current borrowers. If your rate is below 6%, investing in a tax-advantaged account like a Roth IRA likely produces better long-term results. Above 7%, accelerated payoff is more defensible, especially for private student loans with variable rates that do not benefit from federal protections.

How does a Federal Reserve rate cut affect my debt payoff decision?

Fed rate cuts lower the prime rate, which eventually reduces APRs on variable-rate debts like credit cards and HELOCs, but typically by less than the full cut and with a delay. A 0.25% Fed cut translates to roughly $12.50 less per year on a $5,000 balance. That rarely changes the optimal payoff strategy for existing high-rate debt.

Is it better to pay off debt or invest in a high-yield savings account right now?

High-yield savings accounts currently yield around 4.5% to 5%, according to FDIC national rate data. That return sits well below the average credit card APR of 20%, making debt payoff the clear winner for high-interest balances. For your emergency fund, a high-yield savings account remains the right vehicle.

What if I can’t afford to do both, pay off debt and invest?

If cash is tight, prioritize in this order: minimum payments on all debts, then your employer 401(k) match, then an emergency fund, then high-interest debt above 7%. Investing beyond the match comes last until high-rate balances are cleared. This sequence protects you from the most expensive outcomes, missed minimums damage your credit, and no emergency fund means any setback lands back on a credit card.

Does the type of debt matter, not just the interest rate?

Yes, significantly. Federal student loans carry income-driven repayment options and potential forgiveness programs that private debt does not. Mortgage debt is often tax-deductible, effectively lowering its real rate. Credit card debt has none of those features, which is why it almost always gets paid first regardless of where general rates are heading.

Is the 50/50 split strategy right for everyone?

No. The split approach works best for people with moderate-rate debt (roughly 6%–9%), stable income, and a long investment horizon. It is a poor fit for someone with volatile income, debt above 10%, or a history of accumulating new balances while paying old ones. For those borrowers, a full debt-first approach removes the variable that keeps resetting the clock.

How does inflation affect the decision to pay off debt or invest?

Inflation effectively reduces the real cost of fixed-rate debt over time, since you repay tomorrow’s dollars (worth less) against today’s balance. At fixed rates below 4%, sustained inflation can make carrying the debt more rational than rushing to pay it off. Variable-rate debt offers no such benefit, the rate adjusts upward with economic conditions, removing any inflation advantage for the borrower.

The post Should You Pay Off High-Interest Debt or Invest When Rates Are Falling? appeared first on Capital Lending News.